Sure, some of the humor falls flat, the plot is utterly ridiculous, and Johnny Depp provides an uninteresting performance, but the film is visually sound, has some decent characters, a solid performance from Mia Wasikowska, and surprisingly, the film actually has some legitimately exciting (and emotional) moments. Sure, the first film was solid enough, but was it worth making a sequel? And six years after the first one at that? Well, I recently checked out said sequel and, admittedly, it wasn't all that bad. When I heard that a sequel was coming out, though, I didn't get my hopes all that high. Sure, it was a flawed Hollywood blockbuster, but it definitely had some good things to it. Sure, the first film was solid Admittedly, when "Alice in Wonderland" came out in 2010, I enjoyed the film. … ExpandĪdmittedly, when "Alice in Wonderland" came out in 2010, I enjoyed the film. The makeup artists should be proud of their handy work, never have I seen suck attention to detail, the kids wouldn't fall for it though. The Red Queen couldn't have been introduced at a better time, the writers know what they were doing.
I think the majority of people saw the film to once more gaze upon Professor Snape, which is fine by me. It served as a good reminder that Alan Rickman will forever be in our hearts, simply beautiful and knocks the original off of the podium as the better of the two. The film itself was simply perfect in terms of expectation, we've needed this sequel for a long while. It served as a good reminder that Alan Rickman will forever be in our hearts, Alice's new adventure in wonderland is filled with excitement, each frame hand me gripping the edge of my seat. Alice's new adventure in wonderland is filled with excitement, each frame hand me gripping the edge of my seat.
0 kommentar(er)
